Error message
User error : Failed to connect to memcache server: druportbe01:11211 in dmemcache_object() (line 415 of /production/drupal/dim_prod/drupal/d7cl4/prod/unich/releases/7/web/sites/all/modules/contrib/memcache/dmemcache.inc ).
DISEASES OF CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM Course Sheet Academic Year of enrolment:
Professor and Collaborators:
Hours of classroom activity:
Objectives
Contents Cardiac function
Cardiovascular prevention
Ischemic heart disease
Valvular heart diseases
Heart failure
Endocarditis and pericarditis
Extended Syllabus Outline of Anatomy and Physiopathology of the cardiovascular system ..
Cardiovascular prevention: definition and classification
Ischemic heart disease: chronic ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndromes
Risk factors: definition, classification
Arterial Hypertension
dyslipidemia
Smoke
Alcohol
obesity
atherosclerosis, ..
Valvular hert disease: aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve.
Heart failure: etiology, epidemiology and pathogenesis, classification, clinical pictures.
Endocarditis and pericarditis: classification of infective endocarditis, acute and chronic pericarditis
Recommended Bibliography CARDIOLOGIA per scienze motorie e scienze infermieristiche
R. Calabrò, A D'Andrea, B. Sarubbi - casa editrice IDELSON-GNOCCHI
Teaching Methods the teaching course will be supported by slides prepared by the teacher and articles provided by the teacher
Frontal lession
Evaluation methods Verification of learning:
The learning will be evaluated through a final assessment that will verify the level of achievement of the learning objectives The evaluation criteria will concern the correct use of the specific scientific language, the knowledge, and mastery of the contents, the clarity and the ability to critically evaluate the application of cardiovascular system on different population, age and gender. The students will be ask questions on topics present in the program. The exam will not be exceeded if it is ascertained that the student is unable to answer a question, to argue on the topic, or if during the dialogue with the lecturer the student will highlight such gaps as to preclude the possibility of understanding the subject of the application.
The result of the examination is expressed in thirtieths according to a growing scale in relation to the demonstration of knowledge, the appropriateness of the language, the logic and consistency of the exposure:
- sufficient basic knowledge but lacking: voting 18 - 22 out of thirty;
- discreet knowledge and expository clarity: voting 23-25 thirtieths;
- good knowledge and ability to illustrate the topics with ownership of language and mastery of the subject: voting 26-28 thirty;
- excellent knowledge of the topics and excellent exhibition skills, critical reasoning: voting 28-30 out of thirty.
30 with honors is reserved to the student who demonstrates particularly in-depth knowledge, a particular ability of exposure and critical reasoning.
In the event of a health emergency, the oral examination will be carried out remotely by using the platform suggested by the University.
Contacts/More Information Office hours to be agreed with the teacher by e-mail