Error message
User error : Failed to connect to memcache server: druportbe01:11211 in dmemcache_object() (line 415 of /production/drupal/dim_prod/drupal/d7cl4/prod/unich/releases/7/web/sites/all/modules/contrib/memcache/dmemcache.inc ).
ANGLO-AMERICAN LITERATURE I Single discipline educational activity
Course Sheet Academic Year of enrolment:
Disciplinary Sector:
Anglo-American Languages and Literature
Professor and Collaborators:
Hours of classroom activity:
Prerequisites:
Classes and the final exam will be held in English. Students are expected to be conversant in English. Basic knowledge of American literary history is also required, as well as a general sense of US XX century history.
Objectives
Contents US Literature on the American Revolution from 1776 to the Contemporary Age:
Does It still Matter?
Extended Syllabus Primary Readings:
Thomas Paine - Common Sense (1776)
The Declaration of Independence (1776)
Hugh Henry Brackenridge – The Battle of Bunker Hill (1776); selected sections.
J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur – Letters from an American Farmer – “Letter XII” (1784).
- Washington Irving - The Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent, “Rip Van Winkle” (1819)
- Nathaniel Hawthorne – “My Kinsman, Major Molineaux” (1840)
- Herman Melville - Israel Potter; His Fifty Years of Exile (1855)
- Sinclair Lewis – It Can’t Happen Here (1935); selected chapters.
- Paul Beatty – A White - Boy Shuffle (1996); selected chapters.
- Aaron McGruder – The Birth of a Nation (2012)
- The 1776 Report (2021) – the 1776 Commission.
Secondary readings:
1. Wood, Gordon S. “Rhetoric and Reality in the American Revolution”, The William and Mary Quarterly 23, No. 1 (1966), pp. 3-32.
2. Bercovitch, Sacvan. “How the Puritans Won the American Revolution”, The Massachusetts Review 17, No. 4 (1976), pp. 597-630.
3. Robert A. Ferguson. “The Commonalities of Common Sense”, The William and Mary Quarterly 57, No. 3 (2000), pp. 465-504.
4. Portelli, Alessandro, Il re nascosto
5. Reynolds, Larry J. “Revolution and warfare”, in Devils and Rebels. The Making of Hawthorne’s Damned Politics. Ann Harbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2008, pp. 14-50.
6. Zaller, Robert. “Melville and the Myth of Revolution”, Studies in Romanticism 15, No. 4 (1976), pp. 607-622.
7. Tendler, Joshua. “A Monument upon a Hill: Antebellum Commemorative Culture, the Here-and-Now, and Democratic Citizenship in Melville’s Israel Potter”, Studies in American Fiction 42, No. 1, pp. 29-50.
Recommended Bibliography Thomas Paine - Common Sense (1776)
The Declaration of Independence (1776)
Hugh Henry Brackenridge – The Battle of Bunker Hill (1776); selected sections.
J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur – Letters from an American Farmer – “Letter XII” (1784).
- Washington Irving - The Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent, “Rip Van Winkle” (1819)
- Nathaniel Hawthorne – “My Kinsman, Major Molineaux” (1840)
- Herman Melville - Israel Potter; His Fifty Years of Exile (1855)
- Sinclair Lewis – It Can’t Happen Here (1935); selected chapters.
- Paul Beatty – A White - Boy Shuffle (1996); selected chapters.
- Aaron McGruder – The Birth of a Nation (2012)
- The 1776 Report (2021) – the 1776 Commission.
Teaching Methods Seminar classes; optional class presentations; individual research. Class participation is HIGHLY encouraged.
Evaluation methods Verification of learning:
The final exam will be composed of two parts: the first part implies the writing of a book review in English (5000 to 7000 types) on a book selected from a list previously provided by the instructor. The review must be turned in no later than five days before the oral examination.
The second part consists of an oral exam which will be in English. the oral will start from the review and will be composed of 3-5 questions on the primary texts, on the critical bibliography, and on the combined approaches of traditional literary criticism and war literature. The final exam will assess: the student's knowledge of the primary texts, of their formal structure and symbolic language; the knowledge of the critical and methodological texts, as well as the student's ability to effectively employ and apply these approaches; the student's ability to integrate the different critical perspectives and subject areas of the course; the student's ability of elaborate personal insights into the fields and texts examined in class.
The grading scale goes from 1 to 30 cum laude (excellent). The exam is graded: excellent 30 cum laude-30; very good (27-29); good (24-26), fair (21 -23), sufficient (18-22), insufficient (17 or below).